Divorcing Woman Loses Bid to Stop Eviction from Matrimonial Home – What This Means for You
- administration9514
- Jan 20
- 3 min read
Divorce is emotionally exhausting — but the legal consequences can be devastating if you don’t protect yourself early. A recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment shows just how quickly a divorcing spouse can lose their home if they misunderstand their rights. If you are going through a divorce or considering separation, this case highlights why getting legal advice early is critical.
The Case: Wife Evicted After Husband Sold the Family Home
A woman in the middle of a long-running divorce attempted to stop her eviction from the former matrimonial home after it had already been sold to new owners.
Key facts of the case:
The couple was married out of community of property with the accrual system
The husband bought the house in 2003 in his own name
He was the sole registered owner
The home was sold in March 2022
The divorce proceedings started in 2010 and are still ongoing
The wife challenged the sale and refused to vacate
The new owners applied for eviction under the PIE Act
She argued that:
It was the matrimonial home
The sale was unlawful
She had a right to remain in occupation until the divorce was finalised
The courts disagreed.
What the Courts Decided
Both the Western Cape High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled against her.
The SCA confirmed an important legal principle:
A spouse married out of community of property with accrual has no ownership rights in the other spouse’s property during the marriage.
Judge Anna Kgoele held:
“The current legal position does not provide for the woman’s continued occupation of the property pending divorce. The right that she has is a contingent right to share in the value of the accrual determined at the dissolution of the marriage.”
What Does “Contingent Right” Mean?
If you are married out of community of property with accrual:
Each spouse owns their own assets separately
You do not co-own your spouse’s property
You cannot stop your spouse from selling their property
You only get a financial claim when the marriage ends
That claim is for a share of the growth (accrual) of the estate
This means:➡ You can lose your home even while divorce proceedings are ongoing➡ You may be left without accommodation➡ Your only remedy is a future financial claim
Why This Case Is a Warning to Divorcing Spouses
Many spouses wrongly believe:
“It’s the family home — he can’t sell it.”
“I can stay until the divorce is final.”
“The court will protect me automatically.”
This case proves otherwise.
Without urgent legal protection, you could:
Lose your home
Be evicted by new owners
Be forced into expensive litigation
Lose bargaining power in settlement negotiations
What You Should Do If You’re Facing Divorce
If you are married out of community of property and living in your spouse’s property, you should urgently get legal advice to explore:
Interim maintenance applications (Rule 43 Applications), Occupation orders, Interdicts (in appropriate cases), Settlement negotiations, Property protection strategies.
Timing is everything. Once the property is sold, your options become very limited.
Speak to a Divorce Attorney Before You Make a Costly Mistake
At Rudolf Buys & Associates Attorneys, we assist clients with:
✔ Uncontested divorce✔ Contested divorce✔ Child custody & parenting plans✔ Maintenance claims✔ Property and accrual disputes
We explain your rights clearly and help you protect what matters most.
Book a Confidential Consultation Today
The decisions you make now will affect you for years. Get legal advice before it’s too late.
.png)



Comments